A disturbingly unfair election

In May all of us will be involvedimages3E47QAO7 in an election which will have a substantial impact on all of our lives. At the end of the last Government the coalition, led by the well funded Tory Party decided that these elections would take place without a crucial piece of election literature freely available to voters. All Parliamentary elections include a free posting by candidates to every home in the constituency and rightly or wrongly, electors expect this as a matter of course. There are many reasons why turnout on 15th November 2012 was so low, but it is probable that a lack of election address contributed to this. As one of the candidates in November 2012 I vividly recall being quizzed on a number of occasions by potential electors if they would receive a leaflet from me explaining my views. I had to admit that they almost certainly would not. One pointed out that she would not consider voting for a candidate that could not be bothered to send her an explanation of their views. I did have a leaflet which thanks to a generous printer I was able to produce for a modest cost of 1p each. However my limited election budget meant that barely 10,000 or so of these were distributed. Yet Sussex has 600,000 homes. I have no idea how many leaflets the Labour Party distributed, nor what they cost (theirs were a lot more glossy than mine, and in colour!), but I do know their budget was 15 times the size of my own overall. The Conservative candidate who won had a budget 100 times the size of mine. Her leaflets cost approximately 10p each and she distributed 250,000 across Sussex. Because of the inherent advantage that Political Parties have in elections, the Party was able to ensure that these went to the 250,000 houses most likely to cast their votes for the Party.

If the Tory Party truly believed in democracy, they would have agreed to supplying an election address from all candidates in this Mays election. However they know that by preventing such a distribution, that will provide an advantage to the well funded Tory Party candidates, at the disadvantage of the other parties and even more so to the disadvantage of many of the independent candidates. This is not democracy and we should be angry about it. Sadly with support for democratic process at such a low level, it is unlikely that much anger will be felt across England and Wales.


About ianchisnall

I have a passion to see public policy made accessible everyone who want to improve the wellbeing of their communities. I am interested in issues related to crime and policing as well as in policies on health services and strategic planning.
This entry was posted in Parliament and Democracy, Police & Crime Commissioner and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A disturbingly unfair election

  1. Graeme Wood says:

    People forget that only a matter of months ago the British public gave the Conservatives a mandate to govern the country, you may not agree with how they are doing it but that is a better example of what democracy is than a few leaflets. And of course given this mandate they will want to minimise the chances of others who want to threaten their right to govern under the principles they set before the electorate.

    • ianchisnall says:

      I haven’t forgotten Graeme that the General Election gave the Tories a mandate for 5 years, however they are did not stand on a manifesto to control local government elections such as the PCC. The issue of ‘a few leaflets’ is key to ensuring that whoever stands is able to be presented to the electorate as a whole.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s